Episode 12 ~2:10 Colour EN · العربية

CRI, TLCI, TM-30, three colour-rendering metrics, one decision

The CRI method dates to 1965 and still averages eight moderately saturated samples. Television cameras needed their own answer, TLCI. Then IES rebuilt the framework on 99 samples, TM-30 (Rf for fidelity, Rg for gamut area). Three numbers, three jobs.

Animated explainer, press play to watch the concepts now; the filmed cut publishes once production wraps.

What you'll walk away with

Four ideas to carry into the next specification conversation you have.

01

CRI Ra: eight samples, a 1965 method.

Ra is the mean of R1-R8, eight moderately saturated samples. The saturated reds and blues sit outside that average. Current edition: CIE 13.3-1995.

02

CRI R9 is the red Ra never averages.

R9 measures a strong red and is not in Ra, so a source can pass on Ra and still render skin and red badly. WELL v2 accepts Ra ≥ 80 only when R9 ≥ 50.

03

TM-30 Rf + Rg = full picture.

Rf = fidelity. Rg = gamut area. TM-30 Annex E's top preference level asks Rf ≥ 78, Rg ≥ 95 and −1% ≤ Rcs,h1 ≤ 15%. There is no upper limit on Rg.

04

TLCI is for broadcast cameras, not eyes.

It models a camera and display, not the eye. EBU R 137 recommends the method to identify problem luminaires; it sets no pass mark. Different number, different question.

See what the number hides

◆ The same eight colours, three lights
A low CRI quietly drains the reds and skin tones
REFERENCERa 100 CRI 70reds collapse CRI 95true to life
Every chip is the same paint. Under a CRI 70 source the reds and skin go muddy and grey; a CRI 95 source brings them back. The number on the box is describing this shift.
◆ What each metric samples
Eight pastel swatches, or ninety-nine real colours
CRI: 8 test swatches pastel, low saturation TM-30: 99 samples full-gamut, real colours 99
CRI (Ra) averages just 8 low-saturation swatches, so it can miss a bad red. TM-30 measures 99 real-world samples across the full gamut, which is why it catches distortion CRI hides. Pick a TM-30 Annex E design intent and priority level rather than inventing a threshold.

Metric × application × what to demand

What each document actually asks for. Anything beyond these rows is a project decision, not a standard.

Where it applies What to ask for Source
Interior workplaces, generalRa ≥ 80EN 12464-1:2021 general rule, with defined exceptions for particular tasks
WELL v2 projectsRa ≥ 90, or Ra ≥ 80 with R9 ≥ 50, or Rf ≥ 78, Rg ≥ 100, −1% ≤ Rcs,h1 ≤ 15%WELL v2 feature L07 part 1, any one route passes
Pleasing, natural-looking spacesP1: Rf ≥ 78, Rg ≥ 95, −1% ≤ Rcs,h1 ≤ 15%TM-30 Annex E, colour preference intent, 200-700 lux polychromatic
Colour-critical workF1: Rf ≥ 95 · F2: Rf ≥ 90, Rf,h1 ≥ 90TM-30 Annex E, colour fidelity intent
Display and feature lightingV1: Rg ≥ 118, Rcs,h1 ≥ 15%TM-30 Annex E, colour vividness intent
Anything that gets filmedA Qa figure and the production typeEBU Tech 3355. The scale reads two ways and no minimum is mandated, so the project sets its own
Saudi street lighting3000-6000 K, 5-step MacAdamSASO 2927:2019 regulates colour consistency and CCT, not colour rendering

Why three metrics coexist

Five reasons the lighting industry never settled on one number.

CRI was built for incandescent. It fights LED.

The method dates to 1965 (CIE 13), was updated in 1974 to account for chromatic adaptation, and the current edition is CIE 13.3-1995. Ra is the average across eight moderately saturated samples (R1-R8) against a reference at the same CCT: a Planckian radiator below 5000 K, CIE daylight at or above it. LEDs render those eight well but can fail saturated red (R9), deep blue (R12) and complexion (R13). A high Ra hides those failures.

R9 became famous because LEDs failed it.

R9 measures a strong red, and it is not in Ra. It also comes from a non-uniform colour space, so R9 values swing far wider than Ra values and can fall below zero. That is why specifiers started writing R9 as its own line instead of trusting Ra alone, and why TM-30 reports a red-bin fidelity value, Rf,h1, on the ordinary 0-100 scale instead.

TM-30 replaced 8 samples with 99.

IES TM-30-15 (2015) introduced 99 Colour Evaluation Samples, down-selected from over 100,000 measured object reflectances. TM-30-18 harmonised the framework with CIE 224:2017 and became an American National Standard; Annexes E and F were added in 2019; TM-30-20 republished it with no technical change; the current edition is ANSI/IES TM-30-24. Rf is the fidelity analogue of Ra. Rg is the gamut area ratio: above 100 means more chroma on average, below 100 means less. Because it is an area, hue shifts move it too, so it is not a saturation dial.

TLCI uses a virtual camera, not a virtual eye.

Television Lighting Consistency Index (EBU Tech 3355) simulates a broadcast camera's spectral response. A TLCI score reflects how the light will look on-camera after auto white balance. EBU R 137 recommends the Tech 3355 method be used to identify problem luminaires and specifies how to measure; it does not set a minimum Qa. The scale itself carries two readings, one for film-style work and one for live multi-camera, so the same Qa means different things depending on the production. Irrelevant for spaces that aren't filmed.

The metric is the conversation starter, not the answer.

Spec the number that fits the space. For an interior workplace, EN 12464-1's Ra ≥ 80 general rule is the starting point. For colour-critical retail, name a TM-30 Annex E cell, the CCT it applies at, and the red-bin value, rather than inventing limits of your own. The metric is a contract, not a marketing slogan.

Forward the carousel to a colleague

A 15-slide explainer, ready to post straight to LinkedIn as an image carousel. Same content, faster reading.

Sources & further reading

Next Episode

Lux in Real Life

Watch next

Get the next episode by email

Practical lighting know-how from NLC Academy. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing you agree to receive NLC emails.